Free tools for AI search visibility
Every tool here answers one question: how visible is your brand in AI search, and what do you fix first? All eight are live, free and unlimited — no signup, no credit card, nothing stored on our servers.
LLM Rank Tracker
Enter a brand and category. The tracker writes ten buyer-intent prompts, opens each one in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Claude or Copilot, and scores who gets cited — including the competitor named instead of you.
Open tool →LIVE NOWAI Visibility Checker
Enter your brand and category to get a mention rate across five engines, plus share of voice against every competitor you name.
Open tool →LIVE NOWChatGPT Rank Tracker
Lock a prompt set and watch it week over week. Useful when you need to prove a change actually moved your citations.
Open tool →LIVE NOWAI Overview Checker
Check whether a keyword triggers a Google AI Overview and which domains that overview cites, before you write a word.
Open tool →LIVE NOWGEO Audit
Score any URL against weighted AI-citation readiness checks and get a prioritised list of fixes, heaviest first.
Open tool →LIVE NOWFAQ Schema Generator
Paste question and answer pairs, get valid FAQPage JSON-LD you can drop into any CMS. No signup, nothing stored.
Open tool →LIVE NOWSchema Generator
Article, HowTo, Organization and Breadcrumb JSON-LD from simple form fields. The hub for every generator on the site.
Open tool →LIVE NOWllms.txt Generator
Build a spec-shaped llms.txt that hands AI crawlers a curated map of your most important pages, in Markdown.
Open tool →Which LLM SEO tool should you run first?
Run them in the order a diagnosis happens: measure, then explain, then fix. Most people do it backwards, spend a week adding markup, and never find out whether it changed anything.
- Get a baseline. Start with the LLM Rank Tracker or the AI Visibility Checker. Until you know how often you are cited today, every later number is meaningless.
- Find the blocker. Run the GEO Audit on the page you most want cited. It separates problems you can fix this afternoon from problems that need links and time.
- Check the demand side. Use the AI Overview Checker to see which of your target queries actually produce an AI answer. Queries that never trigger one do not need this work.
- Fix extractability. The FAQ Schema Generator and the wider schema generator hub turn your answers into markup engines can lift cleanly.
- Publish a crawler map. The llms.txt Generator writes the file. Read what llms.txt actually does first so you know what to expect from it.
- Re-measure on a schedule. Back to the tracker, same prompts, every fortnight. Model answers drift on their own, so a single reading tells you almost nothing.
What these tools can and cannot tell you
Worth being blunt about the limits, because most vendors in this category are not. An LLM visibility tool samples a probabilistic system. It can tell you, reliably, whether your domain appears in answers to a defined prompt set, which competitors appear alongside you, and which of your pages the model reaches for. That is genuinely useful and it is what these tools do.
What no tool can give you is a fixed “rank”. The same prompt asked twice can return different sources, personalisation and region shift the result, and models update without notice. Treat every figure as a sample with a margin of error, not a position. That is also why a one-off check is close to worthless and a tracked prompt set over weeks is worth a lot.
Attribution is the second honest limit. When an AI answer names your brand and the reader later arrives via a branded search, your analytics records that as organic brand traffic. The AI mention caused it; nothing in the data says so. Judge these tools on citation share, not on a traffic line you cannot isolate.
Free tools vs paid AI visibility platforms
Paid platforms earn their money on three things: scale, scheduling and history. They run hundreds of prompts, do it automatically, and keep the record so you can show a trend line to someone who controls a budget. If AI search is a board-level topic at your company, that is worth paying for and our independent comparison of AI visibility tools covers who does it well.
If you are one person trying to work out whether this matters for your site, you do not need a platform. You need a baseline, a shortlist of fixes and a way to check your work. That is what the tools above are for, and it is the sequence in the LLM SEO guide.
Frequently asked questions
Are these LLM SEO tools really free?
Yes, and without caps. Every tool on this page runs entirely inside your browser — there is no server call, no API bill and therefore no reason to meter you. The trackers build the prompt pack, open each engine in a new tab, and score whatever you log back. No card, no trial clock, no rate limit.
Do I need an account to use them?
No. Not one of them asks you to sign up, and none of them collects an email address. Saved runs and prompt sets live in your own browser storage, so you can close the tab and pick the same audit up later on the same device.
What data do you store when I run a tool?
Nothing, on our side. Every tool here is client-side JavaScript: the brand, domain and prompts you type never leave your device. Saved runs and CSV exports are written to your browser only, and clearing site data removes them. Details are in the privacy policy.
Which AI engines do you check?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude and Copilot. Between them they account for the overwhelming majority of AI answer volume today, and each tool gives you a one-click prompt link for every engine it covers.
How often should I re-run them?
Every two weeks for tracking, and again after any material change to a page you care about. Daily checking will show you noise and tempt you into reacting to it. Read what AI visibility means for the four metrics worth watching.
Will these tools improve my Google rankings too?
Indirectly, yes. Clear answers, clean structured data and crawler access are classic technical SEO wins that happen to be what LLMs need as well. What they will not do is replace links, topical depth or the rest of the work — see GEO vs SEO for where the two actually diverge.
Because measurement shouldn’t cost $250/month
The paid AI visibility market runs from €20 to $800+ per month. Most teams don’t need a platform on day one — they need an honest baseline and the fixes that follow. That’s the job these tools do.